INTERVIEW WITH - PART 2
MICEAL LEDWITH, L.Ph.,L.D.,D.D., LL.D
About His New Book, New DVD and
What He Is Up To These Days...
December 7, 2007 by Louise SaintOnge for MastersConnection, LLC,
©2008 MastersConnection, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

MICEAL: So I had gone through a process when they were really excited about the book, and then I had to say there won’t be any book. If I had been desperate to publish a book, which I wasn’t, I would have said okay, then we have to sort of smudge out the Ramtha references and carry on, and they would have accepted it. But you know, in the way it turned out I had my integrity and I didn’t feel I really had any other option anyway.

MC: Well, it would have been a sellout.

MICEAL: It would be a sellout, yes. Absolutely. I mean books come and go but we are on to something much more profound in significance here than that. The book came out and we had the formal launch in New York on November 7th, and I was there to speak. There was an enormous response and I was thrilled with this in itself, in the main because at no stage did anyone, either there or anywhere else since, ever stand up and say in some sort of hostile way “This is a load of garbage.” The closest I came to it was when one gentleman stood up and solemnly warned me about the dangers in what I was doing and how deceitful the Devil can be to try to lead us astray! I thanked him for his concern but counseled him not to worry on my behalf.

MC: What about those who try to dismiss orbs by saying they are just dust particles?

MICEAL: There are lots of false orb pictures out there, an infinite number of them. But they are not in the main due to dust particles, pollen and water droplets, though such things can cause false orb pictures, but they are easy to distinguish from true orb pictures. The reasons why there are so many false orb pictures out there is that people don’t take enough care to keep their backs to the sun when taking pictures, which has always been a basic principle in photography. So if you have any bright light, such as the sun, the moon, a street light, even a candle in a darkly lit room, there is a possibility that light from that source may strike the lens from the side, and even though that light may not be visible through the camera viewfinder, that light can strike the inside of the barrel of the lens and then zig-zag its way down the lens to the camera plate where it will leave a trail of circular images across the camera plate, that will look like orbs, but in fact are just images of the inside of the camera lens – what I call “lens flare.” A huge amount of lens flare pictures happen every day and it is something that is very simple to avoid.

MC: William Tiller concludes in his foreword, and here is this incredible scientifically oriented person, he concludes that “the appearance of orbs in and around the planet Earth at this time is not accidental.” He goes on to say, “My intuitive view,” — he doesn’t say ‘my scientific view’ which is interesting — “is that it is part of a heightening of awareness brought about partially by the elevation in human thinking and partially by the increase in energies directed toward this planet by mostly benign life forms, the first of a variety of communication manifestations to appear in the unfolding adventure of our future.” Where do you stand in that conclusion?

MICEAL: That is quite a statement for a physicist.

MC: Absolutely!

MICEAL: I accept what Bill Tiller is saying that there is a whole new time about to appear. There are things happening now that have never happened in human history. We have movements of enlightenment going on, such as our own school preeminently, for which there is no comparison, and many others. There is a big shift coming. Things are accelerating.
But you know, I explain in the book why it is that some people see orbs with the naked eye, and why some people do not. We can all see orbs with the naked eye when we have trained our brain to stop filtering out the orb images that are all the time coming in through the lens of our eye and being registered on the retina. The brain allows into conscious sight only about 10% of what comes in through the eye. That is why there is such a difference between ‘seeing’ and ‘looking at’ something. Seeing involves consciousness, a decision of the brain to admit that image to conscious awareness. And it has really nothing to do with being special or holy, or advanced, or being a guru, or an avatar, or in some way looked upon favorably by God or some advanced extraterrestrial civilization. We do not see orbs because of some condescension from on high. It is a wonderful thing, but it has a different explanation.
     Without being able to see them with the naked eye we are seeing orbs on camera because of the appearance of digital forms of cameras which have become commonplace over the last decade or so. Digital cameras are sensitive to visible light, just as film cameras are, but they can also pick up a small area of the top of the infrared band, which is just below the frequency of visible light. They can also pick up a tiny area of the band immediately above visible light, ultraviolet.

MC: Highly spiritual digital cameras!!.

MICEAL: A highly spiritual tool, and I’m sure they are specially blessed by the manufacturers before they leave the factory!!
     Digital cameras can only see a small portion of the infrared band. But orbs are to be found in all bands of the electromagnetic spectrum, which you learned about in your high school physics, including the band of visible light.
     Orbs are in the ultraviolet, the x-ray, and the gamma-ray bands of the electromagnetic spectrum, and their colors, which reveal their electron voltage, betray their origins as I explain in the book. A digital camera cannot pick up an orb in the ultraviolet or x-ray or gamma bands. So for an orb to be seen by a digital camera, it has to lower its frequency down to high infrared, which is just below visible light. But most orbs, and the most beautiful of orbs, are not below visible light. They are higher than visible light, in those other bands that I mentioned. So obviously, for an orb to be visible or to be detectable by a digital camera it has to lower its frequency enormously.

MC: So it has intentionally lowered it in order to be seen then?

MICEAL: Well, that is my contention of what happens in the majority of cases, but obviously there are also orbs in the infrared band and they would not have to lower their frequency to be picked up by the camera since they are already at that frequency. They are infrared in color and they can be very large. They are very close to the physical.
I think that I made very significant discoveries in the course of these six years and over 150,000 photos of orbs.
     One of the main discoveries I made is that orbs are not seen or photographed by the camera in the way that people and horses and dogs and houses and mountains and trees are, which happens because the light from the camera flash is reflected off those everyday objects back into the camera recording plate.
     Some of the stuff that I was working on showed me that orb light was coming to the camera later than the reflected light. So I examined why the orb light was coming later. I discovered, at least I postulated, that the orbs are not seen by reflected light, but by a process that I remembered from my days in physics class, fluorescence.
     So that is my main discovery in the study of orbs, that they are seen through fluorescence which means that the flash from the camera strikes the orb, which absorbs the light photons from the flash, which then change into electrons. This infusion of more electrons spins the electrons already in the orb up to a higher shelf, as they say in physics. It is like blowing up a balloon, and then when the stimulus of the light from the flash stops, which it does after a millisecond, the orb starts to shrink back close to its original size, but remains slightly larger. Once the orb shrinks back there is no room for those surplus electrons that had come in from the flash, so they are spit out of the orb, and at a lower frequency. Those electrons then become photons of light again, and that fluoresced light from the orb is what is registered by the camera.
     So in digital photography when you press the flash, the people and horses and dogs are captured by reflected light. The orbs on the other hand, are captured by fluoresced light which comes back to the camera slightly later. That is an enormously important discovery. Fluorescence is a very useful tool in physics as it can tell us what the makeup is of the object fluorescing. So that kind of light can tell us something about the nature of the orbs and the realms they inhabit. The fact that the light from the orbs comes to the camera later than the reflected light also accounts for the fact that orbs can sometimes appear cropped, because the camera shutter has already started to close when the light from the orb comes through. How many ‘leaves’ make up your camera shutter will determine the shape in which your orb is cropped. So if you get orbs in the shape of triads it does not mean you are specially favored by God, but only that your camera shutter is made up of three parts.

MC: In your book you talk about the connection between the colors of orbs and others levels of reality, or planes of existence.

MICEAL: The colors are very significant in orbs because my discovery of fluorescence as the mechanism by which they are seen, tells you something. If the orbs fluoresce then the quality, the color of the light, will reveal something about the reality they belong to. For example, if the orbs fluoresce infrared light to the camera, then they must belong to a realm that is infrared. Fluorescence tells us not just about infrared light, but about an infrared realm where that kind of light exists, and so on.

MC: So then all the different colors we’re beginning to see in orb photos reveal the realms they belong to, but we’re seeing them in a scaled down version if you will, of their intensity.

MICEAL: Yes, the planes of existence, or levels of energy frequency to which they belong are revealed by the colors. However, to be seen by the digital camera they have to lower their frequency to the level of high infrared and that dims their vibrancy and intensity, as I explain in the book in more detail. This beautifully supports Ramtha’s teaching on the nature of reality and its seven levels. This is what Ramtha encouraged us to do with his teachings.

MC: There are so many types of orbs you mentioned in the book such as veils, plasmoids, rocket orbs, skeletals. What I’m curious about, as it relates to RSE, is there seems to be an increase in the variety and color of the orbs we are seeing. What is your understanding of that? Is it a unique situation?     

                Third part coming the week of March 12th... Stay Tuned...